We aspire to reach the top standards with the collective participation of our council, the Publications Board, the Special Interest Associations, editors-in-chief, editorial boards, program chairs and committees; which would grant every working body of people, together with readers and libraries, to engage impartially and productively. With this conviction, Boston Research Journals determines this document that encapsulates the rights and duties of readers, editors, authors, reviewers, committees, program chairs and libraries. All the rights and responsibilities are undoubtedly implied for the professional staff even though there is no direct reference. For instance, the rights of editors and authors can particularly be achieved by sound service from the professional staff.Inversely, the certified staff will not be able to achieve any success on their
own.

Our fundamental objective is that the publication process endures for the support of membership (Fellows and Associates and Registered Users of Website etc.) of the Boston Research Journals. Boston Research Journals has confidence in its accomplishments that should be deduced commonly in details of our high-quality, cost-effective circulation of knowledge and not barely in terms of a publication’s organization. We stress on the process of publication, which includes papers, web postings, technical reports, audio and video presentations, conferences etc. in Print Journals, 3D Virtual Journals, eJournals and Interactive Journals. The quality of the publications and the assignments that each person considers are medium to these extensive aspirations. This document pertains to journals, books, eBooks, magazines, newsletters, conference proceedings and transactions published by Boston Research Journals, cited in this document in general terms as publications. When specific privileges and duties are restricted to a few subsets of our publications, those subsets would be explicitly acclaimed. Although few exceptions to this policy may take place. These exceptions are commonly raised in Boston Research Journals’ professionally-managed magazines and news services with certain well-timed requirements. Yet, the aim of these publications, as for Boston Research Journals’ alternative publications, is to contribute the finest in material services.

When an author submits a manuscript, a confidential double-blind review process takes place. The goal of the review process is to make a relevant, appropriate and timely conclusion (can take 7 to 15 days or more depending on the research performed) on whether a submission should be published.

Conclusions like these are based on appropriate reviews by well-qualified and unbiased reviewers. Authors have the right to expect prompt, clear, and specific responses. To facilitate this process, a submission should follow publication necessities and authors should be proactive in responding to questions.

Therefore, authors can expect Boston Research Journals to-

• Keep them updated on the status of their
• Use unbiased
• Issue timely reviews and clear
• Maintain

Simultaneously, Boston Research Journals expects authors to:

• Submit their work to only a single publication in a
• Follow submission specifications, e.g., topic areas, originality, page limits, cleared rights, accurate citations, designated contact, acknowledging the contributions to work
• Respond appropriately and in time to
• Respond to reviews with one voice even in a case of having more than one

Respond positively to requests to stand as an arbiter for other papers.

Once a submission has been approved and all the formalities are finished, authors can expect Boston Research Journals to publish the research in a timely and professional way. Authors can anticipate to have approval of all variations to the work. Along with it, Boston Research Journals will seek to not let authors to work unnecessarily. Yet, authors do have a responsibility to work with Boston Research Journals to complete the publication process.

Hence authors can expect Boston Research Journals to:

• Provide some time to fix galleries for journal, transactions, and magazine
• Look for author advocacy of the final copy for journal, transactions, and newsletter articles.
• Be financially responsible for its own internal preparation
• Note all copy-editing changes for journals and
• Avoid introduction of any error in the production
• Avoid addition of matter without the corresponding author’s approval.
• Assure metadata accuracy for journal, transactions, and magazine articles.

And Boston Research Journals expects authors to:

• Express with one voice even if there are more than one
• Respond appropriately to reviews and comments while working on the final
• Work with publisher and editor to accomplish design, quality constraints and other things.
• Maintain a proper communication without any foul

Publication is only a part of the extensive aim of sharing ideas and results. Authors can expect Boston Research Journals to contribute to this broad aim, and particularly to motivate publication in multiple media. Boston Research Journals hopes the authors to identify Boston Research Journals’ contribution and not to publish the same material in other venues, except as legalized by Boston Research Journals copyright policy.

Therefore, authors can expect Boston Research Journals to:

• Allow a submission to be put on home pages and public sources before and after
• Allow an author’s version of their own Boston Research

Journals-copyrighted work on their own server or on servers belonging to their companies.

• Allow metadata information, e.g., bibliographic, abstract, and keywords, for their individual work to be openly
• Allow authors the right to reuse their statistics in their own

succeeding publications for which they have granted Boston Research Journals copyright.

• Provide statistics for every journal, transaction, and newsletter on its regular turn-around time and its current backlog of articles.

And Boston Research Journals expects authors to:

• Appropriately acknowledge the publisher’s
• Guarantee that whenever the authors or their employers provide a link to an individual copy that there is a link to the Boston Research Journals’ definitive version
• Guarantee that all versions copyrighted by Boston Research Journals bear the Boston Research Journals

Boston Research Journals identifies that the quality of a judged publication relies mainly on the unbiased judgment of their volunteer reviewers. An editorial board or program committee should approach an individual reviewer seldom and only with a manuscript that both comes under the reviewer’s expertise and meets the journal guidelines. (Please note that some magazines/journals do not formally review all articles, and that many newsletters and some magazines do not arbitrate articles.)

Thus, reviewers can expect Boston Research Journals to:

● Maintain their anonymity.
● Find out if they are willing to review before the submission is sent to them. The deadline for the review will follow its request.
● Convey guidelines on what comprises a reviewing conflict of interest.

● Ask them to review only submissions for which the editor feels they have expertise, and request only a restricted number of reviews over the course of a year.
● Realize that they have the right to decline a requested review.
● Give a relevant length of time for a review, where the length of time depends on the publication.
● Not again and again ask them to make up for delays presented by
other participants in the reviewing cycle.
● Do not ask them to give reviews for submissions that do not satisfy either specified publications requirements (e.g., page count restrictions) or which are obviously inappropriate for the publication.
● Acknowledge their efforts in the publication process, while maintaining confidentiality of which submissions they reviewed.
● Can inform them of the editorial decisions for the submission, including
the author-visible portion of reviews.
● May tell them who will see their review. Realize that reviewers own the copyright for their reviews.

And Boston Research Journals expects reviewers to :

● Inform the demanding editor any possible conflicts of interest.
● Review the submission by the pre-decided deadline.
● Identify the charter and review standards and processes of the publication.
● Read the complete submission carefully, prepare the review
carefully, implement skilled judgment, use suitable language in a review, and fill out provided review forms in full.
● Sufficiently document in their review the reasons behind their recommendations.
● Review consecutive revisions of a submission that they originally
reviewed, should the editor feel that is relevant.
● Maintain the confidentiality of the existence and status of submissions of which the reviewer becomes aware.
● Do not use/practice results from submitted works in their works,
research or grant proposals, unless and until that material appears in other publicly available formats, such as a technical report or as a published work.
● Do not distribute/allocate/give a submission to anyone unless permitted by the editor handling the submission.
● Maintain the anonymity of the other reviewers, should they become known to that reviewer.

The “Rights and Responsibilities in Boston Research Journals Publishing” promises that Boston Research Journals will preserve the anonymity of reviewers. Editors and administrators of Boston Research Journals publications must keep the individualities of all reviewers of particular manuscripts hidden from authors, other reviewers, and the public.

Recognition of reviewers may be revealed to members of a publication’s Editorial Board or to Boston Research Journals staff as needed to promote expert information in special conditions. In cases like these, identification of a critic may also be told to other reviewers of the similar manuscript, provided that the agreement of all affected reviewers is received. Reviewers must also maintain the confidentiality of reviewer identities, as well as the reviews themselves, that are communicated to them at any period.

Refrain from the anonymity policy is made in the case of review of conference submissions by a program board. It is acceptable to make reviews and the identity of reviewers apparent to the entire package committee, provided that all committee members and solicited reviewers are informed in advance of this practice. (A further refrain occurs when a program committee associate is also an author. Names of reviewers cannot be told to the author.)

This policy does not avoid the simple citation of all reviewers of a particular volume or proceedings without reference to particular manuscripts for the purpose of acknowledgement, or the visibility of reviewer’s names in a composite database for use by the editors.

Boston Research Journals identifies that editing a publication is an important task completed by volunteers, and for some journals, by professional staff. Boston Research Journals thrives to provide editors and program chairs and committees with the best possible support so that they can effectively complete their task. In return, editors and program chairs and boards should be careful in managing the review process.

Editors and program chairs and committees can expect Boston Research Journals to

● Work with appropriate vendors to preserve the confidentiality requirements mentioned in this document in any manuscript tracking system provided to editors and program boards by Boston Research Journals.
● Provide the training, documentation, and support required to use effectively the manuscript tracking schemes provided by Boston Research Journals.
● Keep in mind, that the editor-in-chief or program chair has final rights with regard to the content.
● Stand by the clear, written guidelines.
● Attend and answer in a timely manner when help or information is asked for.
● Note that editors and program chairpersons regulate content.
● Provide a clerical and software infrastructure that supports tracking submissions and management of publications.
● Note that the editor-in-chief or program chair selects the editorial
board.
● Provide the strong, operative, and honourable support to the publisher.
● Agree to the term of appointment for an editor or program head of a publication.
● Avoid micromanagement.
● Keep in mind, that any publishing supervisor or program chair can suggest changes to the publication’s agreement and process for publications.

● Provide evaluation support and editor or program chair orientation for journals.
● Keep an operative appointment and reappointment procedures for
publications.

And Boston Research Journals expects editors and program chairs and boards to

● Inform the publisher in a timely manner of the grade of all submissions.
● Receive the review process in a timely and suitable way.
● Identify and follow through on author rights, reader rights, reviewer rights, and library rights. Particularly to deliver clear, timely and independent feedback.
● Ask for help when required.
● Be a supporter for their journal and to represent the Boston Research Journals well.
● Responsibly cover all sides of important issues and not use the publication as a forum to promote their own opinions and sentiments.
● Note that the editor-in-chief or program chair has final responsibility for the content of the journal. Maintain adequate proceedings.
● Execute with excellence and appropriateness the agreement of the publication.
● Use volunteers efficiently and objectively.
● Collaborate with the publisher on its goals of secondary membership of the Boston Research Journals and the computing profession in broad.
● Indulge in the training and study essentials to appropriately use, and to correctly organize, the manuscript tracking systems provided by Boston Research Journals.
● Do not use any part or complete document of the manuscript given to them.