Abstract
The Differentiated Didactic Approach to the Arts (D.D.A.T.A.) is a unique, multimodal pedagogical and therapeutic model whose efficacy has been strongly supported through extensive clinical application to a cumulative sample of 512 individuals presenting with diverse developmental challenges. This exacting high-power pilot quasi-experimental study was designed to provide foundational validation for D.D.A.T.A., focusing specifically on its quantifiable impact on adaptive behavior and functional motivation in adults aged 18 to 45 diagnosed with Intellectual Disabilities (ID). A cohort of 27 participants was non-randomly allocated to an Experimental Group (n=14), which received the music- and movement-centric protocol, and a Control Group (n=13). The experimental group achieved highly statistically significant outcomes (p<.001) coupled with exceptionally large effect sizes (Cohen’s d>2.3) across the two primary functional domains: Adaptive Behavior (VABS Screener) and Motivation (MAS). Preliminary sensor data from the experimental group, generated by the method’s integral sensor technology (S.T.E.A.M.), robustly reinforce the theoretical underpinnings by measuring a 78% reduction in rhythmic execution errors and enhanced accuracy by 4.8 standardized units. The integration of an autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) system is the next developmental phase, positioning D.D.A.T.A. as a future standard for personalized neuro-rehabilitation. Crucially, the D.D.A.T.A. protocol functions as a neuro-rehabilitative instrument, leveraging music’s inherent capacity to induce measurable neuroplastic changes and motor synchronization. This research provides compelling, robust empirical evidence from a high-power pilot trial, strongly justifying the necessity of a future large-scale Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and underscoring the urgent necessity of establishing a stable, dynamic institutional and research framework for its comprehensive technological and societal implementation.
BRJ now support Model Context Protocol
Research ID
Citation Generator
Cite This Research Manuscript
Figures
No figures added
References (APA)
- Alex Linley, P., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 3–16.1
- Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. Academic Press.
- Anderson, N. H. (1991). Contributions to information integration theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Apter, M. J. (1989). Reversal theory: Motivation, emotion and personality. Routledge.
- Barr, J., & Shaw, P. (2018). AI application to data analysis, automatic file processing. In 2018 First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I) (pp. 100–105). IEEE.
- Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007).2 Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 47–73.
- Brown, R. (Ed.). (2018). Knowledge, education, and cultural change: Papers in the sociology of education. Routledge.
- Buntinx, W. H., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Models of disability, quality of life, and individualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 283–294.
- Chen, H., & Yu, W. (2008). Manual of preVABS. Utah State University.
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007).3 Applied behavior analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 37–46). Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall.
- Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988).4 The motivation assessment scale. Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques, 309–310.
- Fajrie, N., Purbasari, I., Bamiro, N. B., & Evans, D. G. (2024).5 Does art education matter in inclusiveness for learners with disabilities? A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(6), 96–124.
- Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1998).6 Educational psychology (6th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
- Gliner, J. A., & Morgan, G. A. (2001). Measurement reliability. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(4), 486–488.
- Heineken, E., & Sarris, V. (1986). Durchführung von psychologischen Experimenten. Dt. Inst. für Fernstud.
- Heward, W. L. (2011). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Pearson Education.
- Icabone, D. G. (1999). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Diagnostique, 24(1–4), 257–273.
- Koelsch, S. (2010). Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 131–137.
- Krumboltz, J. D. (1983). Private rules in career decision making (Special Publications Series No. 38).
- Macri, D., & Makris, I. (2003). Introduction in musictherapy [Text in Greek]. Grigoris.
- Macri, D., & Makris, I. (2014a). Intellectual disabilities. Evaluation & pedagogical management. Case studies [Text in Greek]. Ed. Macri/Makris.
- Macri, D., & Makris, I. (2014b). Special education issues. (1): Behavioural issues, (2): Students with behavioural problems [Text in Greek]. Ed. Macri/Makris.
- Macri, D., & Makris, I. (2014c). Encouraging students to build teaching material in the context of research. Steps to design your lessons. Diapolis. http://www.diapolis.auth.gr/epimorfotiko_uliko/index.php/2014-09-06-09-18-43/2014-09-06-09-29-21/30-a8-makri
- Macri, D., S., & Makris, I. (2019). The differentiated didactic approach to teaching the arts (D.D.A.T.A.). The case of music. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference of Hellenic Institute Pasteur [Text in Greek]. Hellenic Institute Pasteur.
- Makris, I. (2015a). Innovation and use of technology in special education. Panellenic Scientific and Educational Association of Secondary Education Revue, Erkyna, 6, 175–181. PAPEDE.
- Makris, I. (2015b). Creating a traditional orchestra for the needs of special education. In International Congress Latvia-Proceedings. Rezekne Tehnologiju Akademija.
- Makris, I. (2017). Visualisation and verbalization in the use of special music education. In International Congress Latvia-Proceedings. Rezekne Tehnologiju Akademija.
- Makris, I. (2019). Bonne Pratique: Un concert “Extraordinaire”. Un défi “pour changer le regard sur le handicap”. Fishe Pedagogique, du Programme Cap Sur l’Ecole Inclusive KA2 Strategic Partnership. http://www.ecoleinclusiveeurope.eu/pdf/pdf-ressources-bp-fichespeda-module2/unconcert-extraordinaire.pdf
- Makris, I. (2020). A Differentiated Didactic Approach to Teaching the Arts (D.D.A.T.A.) for the purposes of special education and training. In International Congress Latvia-Proceedings. Rezekne Tehnologiju Akademija.
- Makris, I. (2024). STEAM and D.D.A.T.A.: A multisensory approach to music and development of skills among students with intellectual disabilities. Education and New Developments Proceedings. End.
- Makris, I., & al (2022). Differentiated Didactic Approach to Teaching the Arts (D.D.A.T.A.). In C. A. Shoniregun (Ed.), Learning and teaching methodologies (Vol. I, pp. 169–169). Infonomics Society.
- Malchiodi, C. A. (Ed.). (2012). Art therapy and health care. Guilford Press.
- Mayer, R. E. (2013). Multimedia instruction. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 385–399). Springer New York.
- Rosenbaum, P., Saigal, S., Szatmari, P., & Hoult, L. (1995). Vineland adaptive behavior scales as a summary of functional outcome of extremely low‐birthweight children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 37(7), 577–586.
- Sacks, P. (2007). Tearing down the gates: Confronting the class divide in American education. University of California Press.
- Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being.7 The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335.
- Seligman, M. E. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. Handbook of positive psychology, 2, 3–12.
- Seligman, M. E. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1–23.
- Vera, F. (2022). La perspectiva de docentes sobre la infusión de la sostenibilidad en el currículo de la educación superior. Transformar, 3(2), 17–37.
