Boston Research Journals

The Institution of Psychology. Notes on its History in México

Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez Loranca

Listen to the introduction

Abstract

La presencia de la psicología en México cada vez va en aumento en diferentes ámbitos del día a día, por lo que el propósito de este trabajo consistió en indagar cuáles fueron las condiciones que posibilitaron la emergencia de esta disciplina en el país a través de un análisis histórico y biopolítico. A partir de este trabajo se encontró que la psicología se constituyó en México como una práctica legitimada por el Estado mexicano a principios del s. XX. Sin embargo, los procesos que posibilitaron su emergencia datan del s. XIX. Por lo que es necesario tomar en cuenta que no se trató de una situación contingente, sino que más bien respondió a diferentes factores como lo fueron: la consolidación del modelo de Estado-nación, la modernización de ese Estado-nación, la transformación de la locura en una enfermedad, la constitución del individuo libre regulado por un Estado de derecho. Con base en esto, se tiene que la psicología, a pesar de surgir en un contexto que pretendía la atención y prevención de la locura en la población mexicana, no obstante, fungió como un dispositivo normalizador que ya no necesitaba el escenario del hospital psiquiátrico para intervenir, sino que ahora podía intervenir en el ámbito tanto familiar como educativo con el pretexto de coadyuvar al desarrollo normal de los niños.

Readers can now gain more insights about this research manuscript using chat. Powered by Scholar Lens AI.

MCPBRJ now supports Model Context Protocol

Or import this page into a chat

Research ID

Universal Unique Research ID

Citation Generator

Cite This Research Manuscript
Loranca, D. A. G. (2026). The Institution of Psychology. Notes on its History in México. Boston Research Journal of Medical & Pharma, 1(1). https://bostonresearch.org/scholarly-article/the-institution-of-psychology-notes-on-its-history-in-mexico/

References

  • Adekunle, S. (2006). Applying integrated project-management methodology to hydrocarbon-portfolio analysis and optimization (SPE Paper No. 100967-MS). Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/100967-MS

  • Aramayo, J. L. S., da Silveira, R. R., de Almeida, M. R., & Dantas, T. N. de C. (2013). A conceptual model for project management of exploration and production in the oil and gas industry: The case of a Brazilian company. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.012

  • Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö.

  • Asrilhant, B., Meadows, M., & Dyson, R. G. (2006). Techniques to support successful strategic project management in the UK upstream oil and gas sector. European Management Journal, 24(2–3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2006.03.007

  • Badiru, A. B., & Osisanya, S. O. (2013). Project management for the oil and gas industry: A world system approach. CRC Press.

  • Barbosa, P., Pinheiro, N., & Santos Junior, W. (2013, October 23–26). Metodologia FEL: Sua importância na avaliação de riscos e redução de impactos em escopo, tempo e custo de projetos complexos de engenharia [Paper presentation]. XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção (ENEGEP), Salvador, BA, Brazil.

  • Barney, J. B. (1996). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Addison-Wesley.

  • Becker, M. C. (2000). The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter (1982): A review of the literature(DRUID Working Paper No. 03-06). Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics.

  • Becker, M. C. (2010). The past, present and future of organizational routines: Introduction to the Handbook of Organizational Routines. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 3–14). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J., & Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1052

  • Chang, H.-J., & Evans, P. (2005). The role of institutions in economic change. In S. De Paula & G. Dymski (Eds.), Reimagining growth: Institutions, development, and society (pp. 99–129). Zed Books.

  • Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., & Winter, S. (1996). Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues (IIASA Working Paper WP-96-025). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall. (Reprinted by Martino Publishing, 2013).

  • Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2000). Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. In G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.

  • Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D'Adderio, L., & Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1070

  • Galli, A., Armstrong, M., & Jehl, B. (1999). Comparison of three methods for evaluating oil projects. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 51(10), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.2118/57683-JPT

  • Gandra, R. (2019). Rotinas organizacionais e decisões de investimento sob riscos e incertezas: Uma análise do segmento de exploração e produção da indústria de óleo e gás [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro]. PPED Repository.

  • Gandra, R. (2022). Conciliando os conceitos de rotinas organizacionais e instituições: Uma abordagem teórica. Desenvolvimento em Debate, 10(1), 81–103.

  • Gandra, R., & Pinto Junior, H. (2021). Rotinas organizacionais nas decisões de investimento no segmento de upstream da indústria de óleo e gás. Revista Produção Online, 21(4), 1051–1080. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v21i4.4326

  • Gandra, R., & Pinto Junior, H. (2023). Modelo aplicado aos processos de tomada de decisões de investimento no segmento de exploração e produção da indústria de óleo e gás em ambiente de riscos e incertezas. Economia e Sociedade, 32(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3533.2022v32n1art05

  • Grant, R. M. (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 491–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.314

  • Greve, H. R. (2010). Organizational routines and performance feedback. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 187–204). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Heiner, R. A. (1983). The origin of predictable behavior. The American Economic Review, 73(4), 560–595.

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The mystery of the routine: The Darwinian destiny of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Revue Économique, 54(2), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.542.0355

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2010). The concept of a routine. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 15–28). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Hodgson, G. M., & Knudsen, T. (2004a). The complex evolution of a simple traffic convention: The functions and implications of habit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.04.001

  • Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0150

  • Keynes, J. M. (1983). A teoria geral do emprego, do juro e da moeda [The general theory of employment, interest and money]. Editora Abril Cultural. (Original work published 1936)

  • Knight, F. H. (1964). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Sentry Press. (Original work published 1921)

  • Knudsen, T. (2010). Organizational routines in evolutionary theory. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 125–151). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Macmillan, F. (2000). Risk, uncertainty and investment decision-making in the upstream oil and gas industry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Aberdeen].

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1958)

  • Margueron, M. V. (2003). Processo de tomada de decisão sob incerteza em investimentos internacionais na exploração & produção de petróleo: Uma abordagem multicritério [Master's thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro].

  • Milani Junior, A., Bomtempo, J. V., & Pinto Junior, H. Q. (2005). Processo decisório na exploração e produção de petróleo. Revista Produção Online, 5(3), 8–32.

  • Milani Junior, A., Pinto Junior, H. Q., & Bomtempo, J. V. (2007). A indústria do petróleo como uma organização complexa: Modelagem de negócios e processo decisório. Produção, 17(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132007000100002

  • Miner, A. S., Ciuchta, M. P., & Gong, Y. (2010). Organizational routines and organizational learning. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 152–186). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Motta, O. M., Quelhas, O. L. G., & de Farias Filho, J. R. (2011). Alinhando os objetivos técnicos do projeto às estratégias de negócio: Contribuição da metodologia FEL no pré-planejamento de grandes empreendimentos. Revista Gestão Industrial, 7(4), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482011000400006

  • Motta, O. M., Quelhas, O. L. G., de Farias Filho, J. R., França, S. L. B., & Meiriño, M. J. (2014). Megaprojects front-end planning: The case of Brazilian organizations of engineering and construction. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4(8), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2014.48049

  • Nelson, R. R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 48–90.

  • Nelson, R. R., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Revista de Economía Institucional, 3(5), 17–51.

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2005). Uma teoria evolucionária da mudança econômica [An evolutionary theory of economic change]. Editora da Unicamp. (Original work published 1982)

  • Nepomuceno Filho, F., & Suslick, S. B. (2000). Alocação de recursos financeiros em projetos de risco na exploração de petróleo. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 40(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902000000100008

  • Newendorp, P., & Schuyler, J. (2000). Decision analysis for petroleum exploration (2nd ed.). Planning Press.

  • Penrose, E. (2009). The theory of the growth of the firm (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1959)

  • Pentland, B. T., & Hærem, T. (2015). Organizational routines as patterns of action: Implications for organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412

  • Pisano, G. P. (2017). Toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities: Connecting strategic choice, learning, and competition. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(5), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx026

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press. (Original work published 1980)

  • Project Management Institute. (2008). The standard for portfolio management (2nd ed.). Project Management Institute.

  • Project Management Institute. (2017). Um guia do conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos (Guia PMBOK) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia [Capitalism, socialism and democracy]. Editora Fundo de Cultura. (Original work published 1942)

  • Shuen, A., Feiler, P. F., & Teece, D. J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities in the upstream oil and gas sector: Managing next generation competition. Energy Strategy Reviews, 3, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2014.05.002

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). Macmillan.

  • Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283.

  • Simon, H. A. (1993). Altruism and economics. The American Economic Review, 83(2), 156–161.

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill.

  • Suslick, S. B., Schiozer, D., & Rodriguez, M. R. (2009). Uncertainty and risk analysis in petroleum exploration and production. Terræ, 6(1), 30–41.

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

  • Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116

  • Teece, D. J. (2017). A capability theory of the firm: An economics and (strategic) management perspective (Working Paper Series No. 20). Tusher Center on Intellectual Capital.

  • van der Weijde, G. (2008). Front-end loading in the oil and gas industry: Towards a fit front-end development phase[Master's thesis, Delft University of Technology].

  • Winter, S. G. (1964). Economic "natural selection" and the theory of the firm. Yale Economic Essays, 4(1), 225–272.

  • Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2002). Replication of organizational routines: Conceptualizing of knowledge assets. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge (pp. 207–221). Oxford University Press.

Copyright

© 2026 Loranca. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Journal compilation © 2026 Boston Research Journals.

*Correspondence: Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez Loranca

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

The Institution of Psychology. Notes on its History in México | BRJ